The Truth About Karen Hudes, The World Bank, and Your Gold
by Anna Von Reitz
As the Federal Code Title 5 makes very clear the World Bank and IBRD were two of the three (Federal Reserve being the third) banking cartels that caused the bankruptcy of The United States of America, Inc. in 1933.
As is also clear, the American People were the Priority Creditors of the bankrupt federal corporation (See House Joint Resolution 192 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1934) and also clear that the banks were Secondary Creditors.
When that bankruptcy was finally discharged and settled the World Bank received the actual gold— the physical assets confiscated from our ancestors and which we are heir to— as its part of the loot.
Notice that the gold should have come back to the Priority Creditors—the American people— but one the Secondary Creditors, The World Bank, claimed it instead.
For seventy years that gold was used as the backing and basis for all the Federal Reserve Notes and loans. The Federal Reserve, of course, received all the interest and profit generated as its part of the loot.
And we, the legitimate heirs, received nothing. Zip. Nada. Not even a thank you. This is because the Federal Reserve and its minions serving as corporate officers of the new federal “governmental services corporation” made sure that we were misrepresented and that our political status was changed without our knowledge or consent to that of a mere “inhabitant”—- a British Crown subject.
And what right would a British Crown subject have to inherit American gold? Everything was going along according to plan…..and then, the Americans finally figured it out. It must have been a tough night in Brussels.
The World Bank was caught red-handed in possession of the stolen goods, just like a Pawn Shop owner in the same position, so they turned to their trusted attorney, Karen Hudes, to get them out of this bind.
Karen Hudes is a card-carrying member of the Bar Association. Hello? What do lawyers do best?
First, she lied about being a Whistleblower, to gain misplaced attention and confidence.
Then she lied about no less than four schemes she promoted as a means to hide, stash, cash, or give away the purloined gold belonging to the Americans. When I called her on it on Facebook, she “unfriended” me in record time and hasn’t had the common decency to directly communicate ever since.
And now she is just lying some more, apparently in an effort to find a scapegoat for the still more outrageous and (she hopes) final plan to give our gold to an organization calling itself the “County Executives”.
There’s just one little problem, Karen.
Those aren’t our “Counties” nor are they our “Executives”. They are officers of a colluding conglomerate being run by the brand new UN-sponsored “FEDERAL RESERVE” and they have (1) no public office; (2) no public oath; (3) no public bond; and most importantly—– no relationship to us, the actual living people to whom both the gold and the interest from its investment is owed.
So the World Bank has colluded once again with the new brand of “FEDERAL RESERVE” to cheat the American people in violation of every Public Law and fiduciary duty on Earth.
Now, I would like to address a number of additional, almost gratuitous lies told by Karen Hudes about me, woman to woman.
(1) Karen has variously styled me a “Vatican agent” and as an “advisor” to the Vatican. This is probably because Benedict XVI asked me to act against her and her banker bosses and return the American property to the Americans it is owed to. What a concept!
In point of fact, I have never, ever been associated with the “Vatican” at all. I have a one-on-one relationship with the Pope that totally bypasses the Roman Curia, much less the Vatican—-because I agreed with him that American assets should be returned to Americans and not retained by criminal banking cartels such as the one she works for.
Oh, and as for me being “one of the evil Jesuits”—- I am a lifelong, card- carrying Lutheran. Anyone who doubts it can call up the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Black River Falls, Wisconsin, and satisfy themselves on that point all day long. If I am a Catholic, Hitler was a Jew.
- Karen has accused me—- me, specifically, as working to prevent or delay the so-called “Global Reset”—- I suppose I should be flattered that anyone thinks a Great-Grandma from Big Lake, Alaska, has such power?
The truth is much more pragmatic. The bankers she works for have been holding up the Reset while they wrangle for immunity for themselves. After all the misery and death and destruction they have caused, after all the crimes they have committed, they want guarantees of immunity for their precious little selves and their ill-gotten gains.
The World Bank is, after all, willing to give anyone the gold, once it was proven that it was stolen and belonged to the Americans.
The Federal Reserve is still hoping that we won’t demand the interest and profit they purloined, but, yes, that’s due to be paid out to the American people, too. What do you all say? There are three options: (1) take them all out and gibbet them as pirates—because that’s what they are; (2) forgive them all their transgressions because they are whining a lot and promising to be good boys from now on; (3) something in between.
I, myself, speaking strictly for myself, favor the “something in between” option. I don’t want to see bloodshed over white collar fraud, but I do want to see remedy for the victims and demand that all American assets be returned to the possession, enjoyment, and control of the American people—that is, “the free sovereign and independent people of the United States”.
Read my lips, Karen. Also freely interpret the hand gestures.
If you think that you and the World Bank are getting away with a “hand off” to some of your cronies and pretending that they represent us, you haven’t been following the facts very closely.
And you grossly underestimate the real powers of both the Pope and the little old lady you’ve maligned—not because we are such big, important people, but because we are standing up in behalf of 5 billion other people who have been cheated and defrauded and mischaracterized by the banks you work for.
I would say that if you, Karen, and your bosses at World Bank all want immunity and want to be forgiven your sins you need to give the gold back to the actual beneficiaries and heirs as a first step. That precludes any move to give our gold to anyone merely claiming to “represent” us. It also precludes any attempt to further defraud or mischaracterize us. And then you need to rat out all the other slime-bags who have contributed to this situation, while acting lawfully and circumspectly and in accordance with the Law of the Land from now on. Otherwise, we are all going to recognize you as nothing but common criminals in fancy suits.
3. In her endless search to find a scapegoat, Karen has recently come up with the nebulous “Network of Global Control” discovered by a process of statistical correlation on mega-computers using data nets so vast they can find Black Holes in the sky. Dutch researchers have confirmed the fact that only a few interrelated corporations actually control everything on Earth and are, therefore, responsible for this mess. Duh? She (and they) could have simply read our published affidavit— “You Know Something Is Wrong When….An Affidavit of Probable Cause”.
Everything in the “world”— the fake entity created by Man, as opposed to the Earth—- has been organized under the Unam Sanctum Trust as an interlocking trust directorate under the control of the Holy See for the better part of 700 years, and by “royal families” for another 500 years before that.
What could anyone expect, but that a handful of corporations would be interconnected with all the other corporations? This is not rocket science. This is what happens naturally when you organize an entire planet as an interlocking trust directorate, and then operate it in international jurisdiction of the sea?
Yet, here’s Karen, trumpeting about this supposedly “new” threat? Blaming this “Network of Global Control” that has just been discovered?
The so-called Network of Global Control was in charge when Karen’s great- great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great………..great- Grandmother was a spark in her Father’s eye, even if it was called by different names, even if it was not incorporated, even if there were a greater number of players long ago.
It all comes down to the same thing. This entire planet has been controlled by a small number of people generation to generation, and depending on how diseased or enlightened their minds were, all people have benefited and suffered the same.
We have public roads and bridges and hospitals and libraries, schools and police and fire protection services, telephone and electrical and gas and sanitation and a great many other things now as a result of that “evil” Network of Global Control. And for all that, we can be grateful and supportive, without being enslaved.
At the same time, we have also suffered endless wars and privations, continual “pot stirring” and vicious wrong-headed political, social and religious indoctrinations, war-mongering and profiteering, fraud and injustice—-and in the recent round, press-ganging, enslavement, inland piracy, unlawful conversion of assets, personage, barratry, and undermining of our lawful national governments.
It’s time for the people of the world to cut the mustard and pull the rugs out from under the corporations causing these miseries.
Corporations have no natural right to exist. When they cause harm to living people, they are all subject to liquidation. Think of Dorothy, the Wicked Witch of the West, and a humble bucket of water. That’s liquidation.
The ones holding the final kill-switch on all corporations are the creators of corporations— the Roman Curia, and, without putting a real sharp point on it, the Pope.
This is why all paths still lead to Rome and why the Pope’s decision to take action to rein in the banks has brought such a lot of vicious propaganda against the Roman Catholic Church and anyone associated with the Church— even a Lutheran who happens to agree with the Pope about returning American property to Americans.
The corporations, especially the banks, are completely out of hand—but we have our buckets of water close by. It only requires the will and the courage to enforce the Public Law and The Constitution as it applies to us as “free sovereign and independent people of the United States”.
Much discussion has been generated by the filing of a 279 trillion dollar commercial obligation lien against the American Bar Association, the International Bar Association, and the “Department of Justice (Inc.)” for their part as undisclosed foreign bill collectors implementing this incredible fraud scheme against the American people.
That lien is just one bucket of water and it is not “paper terrorism” to claim what is yours by Law.
Response from Karen Hudes to Judge Anna Von Reitz
Today, I received a polite and direct response from Karen Hudes, for which I thank her. It may indeed open up a worthwhile dialogue.
Here is her query:
Dear Ms. Von Reitz,
Ferdinand Marcos and Jose Rizal, who established the World Bank and IMF to manage the world’s international monetary gold reserves at the end of WWII, distrusted judges. Instead, they established a cooperative of all the nations, headed by their ministers of finance, to manage the world’s wealth in the Global Debt Facility on behalf of humanity. The courts have no jurisdiction over the assets in the Global Debt Facility. That was how the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF were able to nullify the attempt of the International Court of Justice and CIA to steal the assets in the Global Debt Facility. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter188.8.131.52.pdf
Did you even know about the National Advisory Council on International Monetary and Economic Policies, where the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State, and other economic agencies of the US regulate the World Bank? So your advice for the Secretary of State, Secretary of Treasury and President to sue the World Bank was all muddled.
When you accused the County Executives of America of being in receipt of the US monetary gold reserves in the Global Debt Facility, did you have this press release, cleared by the County Executives of America on behalf of the American people, in mind? https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter7.25.14.pdf You object to the international monetary gold reserves of the American people being incorporated into their currency, so that they do not have to pay interest on country debt through income taxes? Why is that? When US Presidents tried to do exactly that, they were assassinated (Lincoln and JFK) or shot (Ronald Reagan)
What is happening is that the American people are restoring their Constitutional government under Article V of the Constitution.
Karen Hudes @KarenHudes 2h2 hours ago
US and other countries returning to the control of their populace: https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter12.19.15.pdf
And here is my response:
I am very glad to see a direct contact from you.
You ask if I am aware of the various attempts of the cabal over the past hundred years to obtain control over the Global Debt Facility at the same time that you must be fully aware that the cabal has had control from the start? How do you think the gold got there? Who do you think set up the IMF? Or for that matter, the UN
Corporation, which was established several years prior to the United Nations Charter?
I have done something very few Americans have done. I have read the complete incorporation papers of the International Monetary Fund. I know exactly who incorporated it, where it was incorporated, and for what purposes. Against that backdrop it does not take rocket science to see (nor to prove) that the entire operation was highjacked almost from the start and used to promote benefits for the banks and politicians rather than the people of this planet.
One of the things I would like to address with you is what I will call a “cognitive dissonance” that perplexes me. You truly do seem to care about people and to be offended by the injustice surrounding you, and yet, like a steel ball bearing pinging around inside a pinball machine, you go from one bad answer to another. It’s as if you really do want to do something right, but keep getting misled or confused.
In order to understand my viewpoint, you must walk through a bit of readily verifiable history with me.
The Definitive Treaty of Peace often called the Treaty of Paris 1783 ended the American Revolution. In Article III you will see that two separate populations are living in the former colonies at that time—– the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” and the “Inhabitants”—- British Loyalists and British Subjects allowed to remain in order to provide “essential governmental services” (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of The Constitution for the united States of America). Those services all pertain to the international jurisdiction of the sea and result from King George acting as the Trustee for Americans on the High Seas and Inland Waterways and retaining his position as “prince of the United States” in that jurisdiction.
The two groups still exist.
The federal government together with its incorporated franchises calling themselves “Counties” and “States” are foreign with respect to the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” to whom the gold is owed—- as foreign as Ireland is from Spain. We have our own unincorporated counties and states and form a completely different body politic operating on the jurisdiction of the land, not the sea.
Does it make any sense to give gold that is owed to Ireland to Spain? Does it make any sense to give gold that is owed to “the free sovereign and independent people of the United States” to the “inhabitants”?
I think that with a little more review of the matter, you will agree that giving our gold to employees of a private, for-profit, mostly foreign-owned governmental services corporation franchise makes as much sense as giving our money to a Finlander employed to shovel our sidewalks and that such an act in no way relieves the World Bank from its fiduciary responsibility to the actual beneficiaries.
Ms. Hudes, as you must be aware, the “federal government” has never been a sovereign government of any kind. It is an association of fifty sovereign states acting in unison with regard to certain explicitly enumerated functions of government. Since the Civil War the federal government of the United States has
been operated by a series of governmental services corporations with the members of the “United States Congress” functioning as a Board of Directors and having the same exact same nature and standing as any other international commercial corporation.
The gold is owed to the organic states from which it came and to the living people who are the heirs and beneficiaries. Gold is an asset of the land, Ms. Hudes. It comes out of the ground, even if it is dug up from the bottom of the seabed. It is called a “national asset” rather than an “international asset” as a result. How do you propose to return a national asset owed to the land and its people by giving it to an international organization that exists only in the jurisdiction of the sea and to “inhabitants” who merely reside here as foreigners providing governmental services?
More importantly, where is the authority vested in our Constitution allowing any franchises of the federal government to represent us in any such matter whatsoever?
I can already tell you that no such delegation of authority exists.
On top of everything else, and as everyone in the world knows—-except, apparently, the employees of the World Bank—-we are currently having a dispute with our “service providers”, so giving them our gold on the presumption that they are our employees and are bound to do what is right by us would be an even more tenuous excuse for the World Bank’s actions.
At this moment, Ms. Hudes, the federal corporation is insolvent, a fact that I would expect you to know. It has piled up such mountains of toxic, odious debt and continues such profligate and irresponsible spending that nobody will give them credit—- except the World Bank which is apparently willing to extend them our assets? Hello? Day by day they have perniciously destroyed their own credit and then, via the fixed exchange rate established by HJR 192 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1934, have taxed our lawful money without providing us the stipulated remedies for this.
When we delegate authority, Ms. Hudes, with regard to our money and actual assets like gold, we delegate it to deputies—-who are sworn fiduciary officers—- not to “representatives”. All you are dealing with at any level of the federal corporate structure, including the federal “County” and “State” franchise operations, are unaccountable, untrustworthy subcontractors who are under contract to represent us in certain capacities and doing a flaming bad job of it.
You will note that their entire fiat monetary system is their private corporate system, not ours. Our fifty sovereign nation states have to our detriment continued to honor their request for a fixed exchange rate, but we, the unincorporated States of America and the people owed the land jurisdiction of the United States have bound ourselves long ago to deal only in gold and silver coin and other lawful money however denominatred. See Article I, Section 10. We are in fact the federal corporation’s Priority Creditors.
So again, why, would you propose to give our gold to them, if we have not chosen to give it to them ourselves?
In full view of the facts, do you think that the Federal United States and the British Crown have done such a good job for us, that we should be anxious to keep their “services” for another hundred years?
No, Ms. Hudes, the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” have been misrepresented, mischaracterized, abused and unequally yoked. If you give our gold to dishonest men merely claiming to represent us in this matter, you and the World Bank remain indebted to us for the entire value of the asset plus all losses we incur as a result of your actions.
I will also point out to you that in spite of all their poor-mouthing about budget deficits, these same charlatans are simply not paying their debts to more honest governments, which reflects poorly on us— as they are supposed to represent us in matters of foreign trade.
Since 1946 the federal corporation has adopted an accounting system pioneered by Easy Eddie O’Hara— Al Capone’s bookkeeper. This “double accrual” system is more commonly known as keeping two sets of books. They split their income stream into “budgeted” and “non-budgeted” accounts and except indirectly never reveal their true income. This has led to the accrual of vast slush funds disguised as “future obligation trusts” and “employee pension funds” and “university” and “special development funds” and so on. A forensic audit of any one of the federal “States” reveals the staggering amounts of credit these thieves have purloined and cashiered away for their rainy days—-all based on our labor and our assets without repaying a dime to us.
Not to put too sharp a point on it, Ms. Hudes, but the federal corporation and its various “county” and “state of state” franchises have operated as criminal syndicates on our shores. There isn’t a reason in this world that we would ever consent to your generous impulse to give our gold to them, nor consider such an action a payment to us.
I trust that this now fully explains why you have once again gone astray and why you must make every effort to become aware of the actual facts and history governing our relationship with the Federal United States.
——Judge Anna Maria Riezinger (aka Anna von Reitz)
Another note from Karen Hudes and the Reply from Anna Von Reitz
I received another note from Karen Hudes, which I have posted below, and which I have replied to with a number of questions that are of vital importance to the future of America. I suggest that if you haven’t tuned into this exchange before, you redline it now and pay very close attention:
Dear Anna von Reitz,
The World Bank and IMF administer the Global Debt Facility containing the world’s international monetary gold reserves. The 188 Ministers of Finance and Development on the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF have agreed that these monetary reserves in the Global Debt Facility are going directly to the people in their currency. The gold in people’s checking accounts will present issues, but these difficulties can and will be overcome. You are wrong in stating that the Board of Governors and me as legal counsel and Overseer Mandate Trustee of the Global Debt Facility are not returning the world’s gold to the world’s people. The Global Currency Reset will extinguish country debt and usury. With the termination of Dr. Jim Kim and Sean McGrath on December 18, 2015, the resistance to implementation of the Global Currency Reset has been removed.
You are also incorrect in stating that the Bretton Woods institutions were hijacked almost from the start. In 1947 the President of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development tried to repeal the powers of the IBRD’s Board of Executive Directors through a single Memorandum. I was locked out of the World Bank headquarters in 2009, the day after I rescinded that Memorandum. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/1947memo.PDF The power of the Board of Governors to fulfill their mandate under the Articles of Agreement of the Bretton Woods institutions remains intact: https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/general+assembly3.pdf
Gold went into backwardation (where the price of gold to be delivered in the future is higher than the price for immediate or “spot” delivery) back in July 2013, and gold has stayed in backwardation since then. When gold went into backwardation in 1971, the Federal Reserve Note went off the gold standard. If gold goes into permanent backwardation because the Global Currency Reset is delayed, this will cause mass starvation, pestilence, and the unilateral surrender of US military might, bringing the world into another Dark Ages and WWIII, just like the way the amount metal in the Denarius was removed to bring about the Dark Ages in 300AD. Ferdinand Marcos’ prayer to the United States makes this very clear. @KarenHudes
It is time to answer Ferdinand Marcos’ prayer:
As legal adviser to two Popes: Benedict XVI and now Pope Francis, your email to me dishonors Ferdinand Marcos’ memory. A delay in the Global Currency Reset will allow the Federal Reserve Note to crash.
You state that the gold governed by the Bilateral Minesfield Breakthrough Successor Agreement is not held free and clear of competing claims. The 50 year period of sequestration was deliberately agreed to so that the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF would not be bogged down with competing claims when the time came to distribute the assets in the Global Debt Facility to its beneficiaries: all of humanity. I have made it clear to all the parties: there is no group which has priority above the rest of humanity. The Board of Governors of the Bretton Woods institutions offers the international monetary gold reserves in the Global
Debt Facility to all of the nations and peoples alike:
The Bilateral Minesfield Breakthrough Successor Agreement was written by Ferdinand Marcos, lawyer for Jose Antonio Severino Mcleod Diaz Tallano, more popularly known as Dr. Jose P. Rizal, who went to the Vatican in 1898, where he went by the name Rev. Father Jose Antonio Diaz. Rev. Antonio Diaz was Superior General of the Jesuits from December 14, 1942 to September 14, 1946. It is quite telling that Wikipedia has removed Rev. Antonio Diaz from its list of Black Popes. The Vatican was obviously displeased that Rev. Father Jose Antonio Diaz established the Bretton Woods institutions with a mandate to return the world’s gold to the world’s people. Which is exactly what is going to happen, with 90-95% likelihood, according to the power transition model developed by Ronald Tammen, Chair of the Department of National Strategy at the National War College. Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century. See also: https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/sentia+model.pdf
In his town hall meetings of December 2, 2013 and March 12, 2014, General Dempsey refused to answer why it was not in the security interests of the US to accept the US monetary gold reserves in the Global Debt Facility. General Dempsey cancelled his town hall within ten minutes of the scheduled time on March 10, 2015 to evade my question again.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter3.10.15.pdf. The power transition model provides a clear benchmark for what is patriotic and what is not, and shows the Knights of Malta in the US Department of Defense for what they are, just as gold provides a clear benchmark for what is true money.
Acting General Counsel
Dear Karen Hudes,
Thank you for your prompt reply. I think we are playing from two different sets of facts. To expedite things and speed up the reset please answer the following questions:
- Why should gold that is owed to Americans be given to and controlled by foreigners who have no connection to us but a dishonored service agreement? Bottom line—-why should our share of the gold be handed over to people who have no delegated authority to represent us in this matter at all?
You and everyone else can see that this is a legitimate problem —and not one of my making.
- Why should we accept such an arrangement as any kind of payment to us? If you, as a Trustee, give my gold to Jake Down the Road, I’m sorry, Karen, but I still haven’t been paid and I am still the lawful Beneficiary who is still owed everything I was ever owed, plus interest.
- Why are you insisting that the solvency of the “Federal Reserve Note” is of such critical importance? The FRN is a private domestic currency—in-house Monopoly money—with a fixed exchange rate against the actual United States Dollar, which is and has always been our currency.
If the “Federal United States” can’t make it after a hundred years of exchanging their worthless paper for our silver and gold, that’s their problem. They haven’t bothered to honor the only contract we have with them —so give us all ten good reasons why there can’t be an
orderly conclusion to our final divorce from the British Empire? Do you think we still need the British Navy to protect us?
- Why do you think that the military might of America will “collapse” if we change our maid service?
I have no doubt that the reason General Dempsey avoided your question is that he didn’t want to tell you out loud that the United States Forces —that is, American Armed Forces— are quite a different thing than “US Armed Forces”. Without us, Karen, the “US Armed Forces” pretty much dwindle down to the Puerto Rican Navy and the Home Guard on Guam. Fortunately for everyone concerned, we are not dependent on the Federal United States. They are and have always been dependent on us.
- Gold “backwardation” is just fancy jargon for not enough metal reserves to meet demand and quell crazy speculation. You want to release the reset to give everyone their fair share of gold, ease all these tensions and get the world economy flowing again. Understood.
Why not give the American share of the gold to the Americans and get on with it?
General Dunford secures delivery, the gold backs the actual United States Dollar, and all is right with the world. Tell us why that seems so very difficult?
- My advice to the Vatican and the Pope and to you is all the same. Give the gold to the people it is actually owed to and don’t fool around playing politics. Let the people sort things out for themselves. We don’t have a problem with you giving a fair share to the Puerto Ricans and the Samoans and all the other people in the Insular States and Haiti and everywhere else. We are all for it. We simply want our share delivered into our hands and into our control. Britain has acted as Mommy Dearest for the last time. We have no contractual obligation to the Brits or the Federal United States related to this matter and you have been notified. That should be that.
And if it isn’t, this is your moment to explain to the whole world why not?