Anna von Reitz
Another Declaration of Independence — Everyone Note, Share, Go Viral!
Yesterday a Reader sent me a link to an important historical find— another parchment copy of The Declaration of Independence has turned up — in England, Chichester in Sussex, to be exact.
Why is this important?
Because up until now there has been exactly one such original in existence, and that one has been crumbling to dust in the National Archives without corroboration except for 26 printed copies prepared for members of Congress at the time. Read that— this is an “original copy”— handwritten in wet-ink and signed with wet-ink signatures by the Founders.
It is in a whole different league of rare documents and is a true Primary Source document.
The discovery has also thrown light on a long forgotten debate— whether the authority for the Declaration derived from the people acting as a unitary nation in support of the Declaration or from the federation of states representing them in international jurisdiction?
Today that question is well-settled. The sovereignty of the states derives from the natural sovereignty of the people inhabiting them as an unincorporated Body Politic, and no federation or association of states is considered a sovereign nation, but is rather acting as an agent of sovereign nation-states.
It may come as a surprise to many people around the world, but neither the United States nor the United States of America nor the old Union of Soviet Socialist Republics have ever functioned as sovereign nations in and of themselves and they are unable to contract as such.
Any exercise of sovereign power by any of these federations, confederations, or associations of nation-states has always rested upon the sovereignty of the people inhabiting their land jurisdiction states.
It will also come as a surprise to many around the world that in order for these federations of states to form treaties and other agreements, proxy heads of state had to be named to serve these associations of sovereign states.
To this day, the Queen of England serves as the proxy sovereign of the Territorial and Municipal United States with regard to the delegated and enumerated powers established by The Constitution for the united States of America, while James Belcher serves as the proxy sovereign and head of state for the actual land jurisdiction states dba United States with regard to the un-delegated powers reserved by the land jurisdiction states and people.
There is, in effect, a bifurcation of international jurisdiction that was created by the actual American constitution — with the British Queen having control of commerce, and the Belchers who have been international free sovereigns since 1087 A.D., having control of all private American shipping and trade.
This odd arrangement grew out of the situation immediately following the Revolutionary War, wherein England stood at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, starved for American raw materials for the better part of a decade—and the Americans were unable to protect their commercial fleet from French and other privateers without a navy.
The Americans couldn’t get their products to market and the British were starving for the same, so they made a deal the details of which are immortalized in a series of treaties taking place from 1778 to 1789. The British would control commerce (business between corporations) and the Americans would control trade (private business between unincorporated businesses and people generally).
For those agents of the British and French Governments presently trying to give away what they don’t own (our land), and pretending to represent the actual United States while in fact only representing the Territorial and Municipal United States— take note. You do not have authorization to make any claim of abandonment nor any disposition of land assets.
For Neil Keenan and the Chinese and Philippine governments and the DOD Asset Recovery Team — be advised. The actual land jurisdiction government and our lawful international agents and our lawful Head of State have not been invited to the settlement meetings.
It has been to the financial advantage of the British and French Governments to pretend that we no longer exist and to make false claims of abandonment in Breach of Trust and Commercial Contract regarding our land assets, gold that was confiscated under color of law, and other assets owed to the American states and people.
So tying it all back to the newly discovered Declaration of Independence — it is proof that the famous document was received on British soil, physical proof, quite apart from the deliberations and fulminations of the Parliament at the time. It says in no uncertain terms that the words were received.
To those who would lie about us and about our condition and about our political status and about our identities—- hear it again: “We hold these truths to be self-evident….”