Choose Your Court — Before or After “Equity”

Sunday, April 29, 2018

Choose Your Court — Before or After “Equity”

By Anna Von Reitz

I have devoted several articles to the evils of British Equity Courts, mainly deriving from the fact that the judges in such courts are allowed to act as Proxies for the British King and everyone in such a court is “presumed” to be a British Subject — therefore the judges can do whatever they please without restraint by the actual written law at all.

This is a gross abuse of power left in the hands of unaccountable bureaucrats, many of whom in our case at least, have no proper training in law of any kind thanks to the imposition and spread of the quasi-military tribunals created by the Territorial United States Congress in the wake of the so-called Civil War.

Yet, we have known that the rats had to leave an “out” for themselves, a means by which they could inflict this evil upon others, yet leave an escape route for their own use.  Here it is.

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds the power of the King’s Bench as it was in 1722 — before the Admiralty Law was allowed to pollute British Common Law and before judges were allowed to sit as proxies for the King.  This is where the rats bring their business when they want justice.  

The King’s Bench in America – Non-Equity Court — 1722

Pennsylvania Statutes Title 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 502

Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. General powers of  [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court

The Supreme Court shall have and exercise the powers vested in it by the Constitution of Pennsylvania, including the power generally to minister justice to all persons and to exercise the powers of the court, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as the justices of the Court of King’s Bench, Common Pleas and Exchequer, at Westminster, or any of them, could or might do on May 22, 1722.  The Supreme Court shall also have and exercise the following powers:

(1) All powers necessary or appropriate in aid of its original and appellate jurisdiction which are agreeable to the usages and principles of law.

(2) The powers vested in it by statute, including the provisions of this title.

And here is where the rats drag in the cat and seek political and commercial protection from the King’s Proxy:

The King’s Bench in America – Equity Court – After 1722

The Delaware Court of Chancery

The Court of Chancery has jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters and causes in equity. The general equity jurisdiction of the Court is measured in terms of the general equity jurisdiction of the High Court of Chancery of Great Britain as it existed prior to the separation of the American colonies. The General Assembly may confer upon the Court of Chancery additional statutory jurisdiction. In today’s practice, the litigation in the Court of Chancery consists largely of corporate matters, trusts, estates, and other fiduciary matters, disputes involving the purchase and sale of land, questions of title to real estate, and commercial and contractual matters in general. When issues of fact to be tried by a jury arise, the Court of Chancery may order such facts to trial by issues at the Bar of the Superior Court of Delaware. (10 Del. C., 369).

As you can begin to catch the drift, all the PERSONS they created for themselves were considered British Subjects and brought into courts of equity where the King’s Proxy, the Judge, could rape, plunder, and pillage as he pleased — and also where he could protect the interests of the King in any business matter, grant bankruptcy protection and clemency to the King’s Privateers, and provide for all the other dirty business of the Crown.

And now you know how they worked it to benefit and protect themselves while acting in gross Breach of Trust and in violation of their commercial contracts on our soil—- with the help of our own dumbed-down and/or corrupted military officers and politicians, of course.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*