Friday, May 18, 2018
The Public Law and the Private “Law”
By Anna Von Reitz
Yesterday, I discussed the necessity of nailing down exactly which “United States” is being referred to in every instance and brought attention to the fact that our Territorial servants have defrauded us via the use of deliberate confusions and semantic deceits.
This process of “mirroring” everything is endemic, from the sacred office of the Pope being mirrored by the secular office of Pontiff, and the United States of America, Inc. being passed off as The United States of America (Unincorporated) on down. It therefore comes as no surprise that The United States created by the Colonies back in 1776 has been “mirrored” by the United States exercising powers delegated to it in 1787, and that the Territorial United States and Municipal United States have made merry with the name “United States”, too.
This basic principle of the Satanists holds true throughout their system. They label everything and mirror everything, even the law itself.
The Public Law is mirrored by their private law.
Our Sheriffs are peacekeeping officers. Their Sheriffs are law enforcement officers.
These are two different offices, one public, one private, both called “Sheriff”.
Yet another similar names deceit.
The vermin attempt to confuse one with the other, and to convince you that you are subject to their private “club” law, which amounts to the “public policies” of a corporation.
Yesterday, we also discussed the Clearfield Doctrine. When an entity exercising our delegated powers debases itself and engages in commercial activity as an incorporated entity, it loses any special governmental powers or sovereign immunity and descends to the nature of any other commercial corporation.
Very clearly what has happened here is that private commercial corporations have been entrusted with governmental functions. They have then hidden behind their government “identity” and used those delegated but still coercive powers to benefit their own bottom lines and protect their own corporate interests at the expense of competitors.
Imagine giving Exxon the ability to act as “the government”?
So how is it possible that you, a free born American, could become liable and subject to the public policies of a foreign corporation merely under hire to provide stipulated governmental services?
By contract — and in this case, undisclosed and unconscionable contract employing semantic deceit (Are you a US [Territorial] Citizen?) and improper use of the coercive powers of what appears to be government (You have to sign up for Social Security in order to have a [Federal] job….) to feather the nests and extend coercive power to private corporations.
Reclaiming your Trade Name re-establishes your identity as an American eligible to claim back your birthright estate as a living man or woman, and enables you to then lay claim to the derivative NAMES that the vermin have established “for” you in the following forms: JOHN DOE (a public charitable trust), JOHN M. DOE (a public transmitting utility) and JOHN MARK DOE (a constructive foreign grantor trust ESTATE)—-and return all them to a permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth.
This effectively severs the unconscionable contract that they have created for their own benefit and the benefit of their foreign commercial corporation, which is supposed to be providing your States with good faith service, and corrects the falsified public records they have used against you.
Put another way, when you remove your names from their jurisdiction they no longer have a “handle” to seize upon and manipulate you and your assets. Whatever contract there is, is re-written in your favor. It is therefore of the utmost urgency and should be of your utmost concern to “come home” and take care of your own affairs, shed yourselves of these unconscionable presumptions, and stand in your true nature again.
If anyone asks, tell them that you have “retired” from all obligations and duties of Territorial and/or Municipal Citizenship and “returned” to your birthright political status on the land and soil of your native state, without prejudice.
This is equivalent to saying— “Hey, fella, you can do what you want to do. If you want to subject yourself to the Queen and be plundered for your trouble, that’s your business. Leave me to mine. I obey the Public Law, which is sufficient.”
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.